Philippians 2:5-11 and Colossians 1:13-20 are two of the most explosive passages in the New Testament. They read like poetry, and for over a century scholars have labeled them “early Christian hymns.” Open a Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament and you’ll even see them set out in stanzas. But here’s the live question: were these lines sung by the earliest churches, or are they Paul’s own crafted prose?
In recent years, voices like Edsall and Strawbridge have argued against the hymn label. They point out that while these passages were quoted hundreds of times in the first centuries of church debate, no early writer ever calls them hymns. Instead, they propose we view them as “heightened prose”- Paul’s rhetorical praise within his letters. Their critique has caught traction, especially since it pushes back on what can happen when a scholarly hunch hardens into assumed fact.
At the same time, others continue to defend the hymnic view. Some point to the rhythm and parallelism that set these texts apart from their surrounding context. Studies as recent as 2024 still argue that the Philippians passage in particular functions like a Christ-song- whether composed by Paul or borrowed from worship gatherings. Colossians has also drawn fresh analysis, with scholars highlighting the passage’s deliberate structure as a crafted unit of praise.
So why does this matter? If these are hymns, Paul is anchoring theology in the church’s lived worship. If they are his prose, then Paul himself is our first witness to these soaring Christological claims. Either way, the effect is the same: they are among the clearest early declarations that Jesus shares in God’s glory, name, and honor.
The debate hasn’t closed, and maybe that’s the point. Whether song or prose, these passages force us to reckon with how the first Christians praised Christ- and what that says about their faith.
Leave a reply to Samuel Vincent Cancel reply