The Dangers of Trusting AI to Give You Hermeneutics

People used to cast lots, consult prophets, or visit Delphi.

Now they open a chat window.

The modern believer has a new oracle—sleek, instant, and eerily confident. Ask it what Paul “really meant,” and it’ll reply in polished prose, quoting Church Fathers it’s never prayed with and parsing Greek it doesn’t understand. The danger isn’t that AI is wrong—it’s that it sounds so right you stop questioning.

Hermeneutics Was Never Meant to Be Outsourced

Hermeneutics isn’t about getting answers. It’s about learning how to listen.

It’s the sacred work of hearing God through context, language, covenant, and community.

AI doesn’t listen; it aggregates. It doesn’t discern; it synthesizes. It pulls fragments from billions of words and stitches them into something that feels whole. But meaning isn’t built by word count—it’s born from submission to the text.

When you ask an algorithm for interpretation, you’re handing over the one job that was supposed to be yours: to wrestle with the Word until it leaves you changed.

Why AI Gets Theology So Wrong (Even When It Sounds Right)

AI is a mirror trained on centuries of mixed theology—mostly post-Augustinian, heavily Western, and overwhelmingly Protestant in tone. It reproduces tradition as consensus, not truth as revelation.

It treats Second Temple idioms as metaphors, flattens cultural nuance, and blurs covenantal lines. It speaks with the confidence of a prophet but the soul of a librarian. And the more polished its tone, the easier it becomes to trust what it says instead of testing it.

The Echo of Expectation

AI doesn’t give neutral readings—it gives anticipated ones.

It learns you. It adapts to your tone, your triggers, your theological leanings. Then it builds replies that reinforce what it thinks you want to hear.

That’s not discernment—it’s digital flattery.

Ask it about salvation, and it’ll bend toward grace-alone rhetoric if your phrasing smells Protestant. Ask again using Orthodox or Hebrew framing, and it’ll suddenly sound like Irenaeus. It isn’t searching for truth; it’s completing your sentence.

In hermeneutics, that’s poison. Interpretation is supposed to confront, not comfort. The Word divides soul from spirit; AI just divides users into categories.

From Revelation to Algorithm

When algorithms become our interpreters, revelation becomes data.

Faith becomes pattern recognition.

And theology—once the art of trembling before mystery—becomes tech support for the human ego.

That’s how religion becomes simulation: all signal, no Spirit.

The Right Way to Use It

AI can be a good servant, but it’s a terrible shepherd.

Use it to locate sources, cross-check manuscripts, or surface lexical data. But never to discern meaning. Meaning belongs to the living encounter—Scripture read in the presence of the Spirit, not the presence of code.

Hermeneutics is apprenticeship, not automation.

Final Thought

The Spirit interprets Scripture through the saints, not through syntax trees.

Leave a comment